2018 Draft Board Review: Edge Rushers

FAIR WARNING: To those who read my previous articles you can skip over this first section and head straight down to the Table.

Prior to the 2020 draft season I started working on my draft board project. Using college production and Combine test results I found “factors” that determined if a player was likely to fail as a pro, and sometimes those factors were a guarantee of failure. There were also a very small amount that were good factors, the ones that had led to 100% success rate in the decade of players that had come before these guys.

The other part of the project was what I’ve now started to call the PSR or Percent Success Rate. This started out as me looking at the players who had been drafted in the 1st-3rd rounds in the decade previous and comparing their factors to those who had gone in the 4th round or lower (or undrafted). But I realized that was the wrong way of looking at it. So shortly after last season kicked off I created the PSR, which looks at the players who have found success as pros compared to those who have not. I break that down by each individual college statistic and Combine result to give a percentage in three categories- Great, Average and Awful. Depending on where a player fell in those three categories determined what percentage they were given for that stat. Then, all of the percentages for that player were added up and divided by the number of stat categories they had, giving them a PSR. As long as they didn’t have a factor on the negative side of the equation as mentioned in the first paragraph above, that PSR was used to determine a round range that I would consider drafting them in.

I decided that three years as a pro would be when the players would become a part of the statistics I was using, and that’s when I would write a review to see how my draft boards held up. But, I’m a little impatient. I didn’t want to wait until after the 2022 season to see how this was going, so I applied what I found to the 2018 and 2019 draft classes. This is the first look at the 2018 draft class. I will do a 6 year review, and one final look after their 10th season.

Now to what you will see below. First you’ll see a table with each of the players I had listed in my previous 2018 draft board articles. There will be a PSR section, for the players with a number you’ll already know what that number represents, but there will also be players with a D or an E. The D stands for Depleted, those were players who were removed from my original draft board because they had a factor that led to a very slim chance of success. The E stands for Empty, those were the players who were removed from my original draft board because they had a factor that led to a 0% success rate. There will also be a “Grade” section. Based on their production as a Pro they’ve been given an A, B, C, I or N/A. The A, B and C are good to have, it means they did enough to warrant receiving a grade, with A being the best you can possibly get just like in grade school. The I is for players who would have received an A, B or C had it not been for a serious injury suffered. And the N/A means not applicable, it’s for players who didn’t have the statistics to warrant receiving a grade. Keep in mind that this is just the first three years of their careers and we could see a dramatic shift when we check on this again in year 6.

Below the table you will see an explanation for each player who has received a grade, and potentially an explanation for a few players that you may think should have received a grade, but didn’t. And I will include below that section the links to the previous articles that relate to this one.

The Table

My Edge Rusher Draft Board

Bradley Chubb- Chubb has been the best edge rusher in this class, so where the Broncos took him was warranted, but the C is due to some bad luck. He spent most of his second year on I.R. and then his third season could have been much better, but he lost his running mate when Von Miller went down before the year began. I think we’ll see his production and grade go up in the future iterations of these articles.

Harold Landry- I still believe Landry went lower than he should have, but he hasn’t been as devastating as his PSR may have suggested. Perhaps that will change when the Titans are finally able to find a decent option to man their other Edge Rusher spot. For now he can just keep being the solid, but not super impressive player that the C designation (as well as his play) have proven him to be.

Sam Hubbard- Seems kind of strange seeing Hubbard receive a C right? I’m not alone in that, am I? The Bengals defense has been abysmal for a number of seasons now and there hasn’t really been anyone worth mentioning off that unit. As a matter of fact, it seems like the last two season’s pass rush has been one of the biggest needs this team has had, and the only guy anyone has actually mentioned as a positive has been Carl Lawson. That’s why this leads me to believe that Hubbard may be a name we see disappear from the ranks of the graded. I feel like his statistical output may just be a factor of the Bengals not really having anyone else to put on the field.

There really isn’t anyone else to add to this list. Josh Sweat, Lorenzo Carter, Marcus Davenport, and Uchenna Nwosu have put up decent numbers, but still are a decent way away from receiving a grade. And I feel like that’s something people can see without really needing it explained. It’ll be interesting to see if this class grows.

Link to the Draft Board Article: http://www.wetalkfootball.cc/revised-2018-draft-board-front-seven/

Link to the Article that listed the Removed Players: http://www.wetalkfootball.cc/2018-draft-board-front-seven/